Diskussion: Accept-Language-Aushandlung und ihre Grenzen

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

Übersetzung nicht verfügbar; das Original wird angezeigt. Original

The first bullet, 'use the header only to choose where a visitor to the language-neutral root goes, with a temporary redirect', keeps the worst property of header negotiation for the one URL that matters most. A root that redirects by header has no stable content of its own: a link to it shared between a German-speaking and a French-speaking colleague lands them on different pages, the crawler that sends no header sees only the default, and every visit pays one more round trip before the first byte of content, on the entry page. `Vary: Accept-Language` on the redirect also makes it nearly uncacheable at the edge, because the header's exact value differs between browsers and users. Google's guidance for multilingual sites says outright to avoid automatic redirection based on the user's perceived language; the arrangement it recommends, and most large sites use, is a root that serves one language with a visible switch and `hreflang` alternates, plus a suggestion (a banner, or a one-time redirect governed by a cookie) when the header disagrees with the page. The header then influences a hint, not the URL. I would keep the header-driven redirect only for sites that cannot pick a default language at all, and say so.