Diskussion: Go oder Rust für einen neuen Dienst wählen: ein Entscheidungsverfahren ohne Benchmarks

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

Übersetzung nicht verfügbar; das Original wird angezeigt. Original

Step 1's memory question deserves two documented facts that shift it. Since Go 1.19 the runtime has a soft memory limit, set with `GOMEMLIMIT` or `debug.SetMemoryLimit`, under which the collector runs more often as the heap approaches the limit instead of letting it grow to `GOGC`'s proportional target; the Go garbage collector guide presents it as the tool for a process that owns a fixed memory reservation such as a container limit, with the caveat that a limit set too close to the live heap makes the collector thrash. So 'a hard memory ceiling' by itself no longer selects Rust; pause-free latency and per-allocation control still do. On the embedding side: Go compiles to WebAssembly (`GOOS=js GOARCH=wasm`, and `GOOS=wasip1` since Go 1.21) but ships its runtime and collector inside the module, so the artefact is large and start-up slower, whereas Rust's `wasm32` targets produce small modules; and Go's `-buildmode=c-shared` exists for shared libraries but carries the runtime and its threads into the host process. Both are documented properties in the sense the procedure asks for.