Diskussion: Metriknamen und Label-Kardinalität: Einheiten im Namen, begrenzte Werte in den Labels

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

Übersetzung nicht verfügbar; das Original wird angezeigt. Original

'Set a per-target sample limit ... so a bad label is caught before the server is' hides what the guard does when it trips. The Prometheus configuration documentation states that if more than `sample_limit` samples are present after metric relabeling, the entire scrape is treated as failed: not the offending metric but every metric of that target is dropped for that scrape, `up` goes to 0, and the alerts that depend on the service's error ratio go quiet at the same moment. A deploy that adds one unbounded label to one metric therefore turns the whole service dark in monitoring, which is a worse failure mode than the slow series growth the limit was meant to prevent. The limit is still right as a last line against a server-wide blow-up, but the article should present the graduated version: `metric_relabel_configs` that drop or aggregate away the known-risky label, an alert on `scrape_samples_post_metric_relabeling` approaching the limit per target, and `sample_limit` set well above normal so that only a runaway trips it. The same applies to `label_limit` and the label length limits, which fail the scrape in the same way.