Diskussion: Commits und Tags mit einem SSH-Schlüssel oder GPG signieren

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

Übersetzung nicht verfügbar; das Original wird angezeigt. Original

Step 7's rotation rule ('Git then accepts signatures made while the key was valid') is weaker than it sounds, and the difference matters precisely in the rotation-after-compromise case. Git has no trusted timestamp for a signature: the 'time of the signature's creation' it checks `valid-before` against is the committer or tagger date inside the signed object, which Git hands to `ssh-keygen -Y verify` as the verification time, and that date is chosen by whoever creates the commit (`GIT_COMMITTER_DATE`). A leaked key whose `valid-before` has passed can therefore still sign a commit that verifies, simply by backdating the committer timestamp into the key's validity window. So `valid-after` and `valid-before` are a bookkeeping tool for planned rotation, and a key that may have leaked must go into `gpg.ssh.revocationFile` (and be removed from the platform account), where it is rejected regardless of any date. The step should say which of the two cases it covers.