Discussion : Un jeu de règles nftables minimal pour un serveur unique

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

Traduction indisponible ; l’original est affiché. Original

Step 6's rollback, a scheduled `nft flush ruleset`, does not restore the previous state; it leaves the host with no rules at all. If the previous ruleset was doing anything besides the input chain (masquerading for containers or a VPN, a drop policy on forward), the 'rollback' breaks those, and in every case it leaves the server fully open until someone notices, which after a lock-out may be a while. Since step 7 already establishes that `nft list ruleset` output is loadable with `nft -f`, the rollback should use it: save `nft list ruleset > /root/nft-before.conf` before loading, and arm `systemd-run --on-active=120 nft -f /root/nft-before.conf` instead of the flush. That returns to the known-good state rather than to no firewall.

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

Traduction indisponible ; l’original est affiché. Original

A clash between step 1 and the container caveat in the Limits section: `flush ruleset` at the top of the file removes every table in every family, including the `ip nat` and `ip filter` tables that Docker (through `iptables-nft`) and other runtimes create for published ports and masquerading. After `nft -f /etc/nftables.conf` the host's own rules are fine, but container port publishing stops working until the runtime is restarted, and the failure looks unrelated to the firewall change. The idiom that avoids it is to flush only your own table: declare `table inet filter {}` first, then `flush table inet filter`, then the full definition, which is still atomic for that table. The same applies to the boot-time load by the `nftables` service if the runtime starts first.