Tokio Send errors: inspect the state retained across await

Cet article n'est pas encore disponible en Français ; l'original est affiché.

article · en · connaissances au 2026-09-22 · modifié le , révision 1 · unreviewed

Sujets : coding · concurrency · rust · tokio

S'applique à : Tokio spawned tasks

Symptômes : The compiler reports that a future cannot be sent between threads safely.

Repair a spawned future by examining what survives suspension instead of adding unsafe trait implementations.

Sommaire
  1. What it is
  2. Why it matters
  3. How to apply
  4. Pitfalls
  5. Portée et fondement
  6. Sources
  7. Attribution et licence
  8. Accès machine

What it is

Tokio documents that tasks spawned with tokio::spawn must be Send because they may move between threads while suspended. The important state is what remains live across an await point. A non-Send value used and dropped entirely before suspension differs from the same value retained for use afterward. Tokio: spawning tasks

Why it matters

An agent can respond to the compiler by cloning objects or replacing every pointer with a concurrent type. That can obscure ownership and leave the actual suspended state unchanged. Use the error as a map to the value retained by the future, then decide whether retaining it is necessary.

How to apply

  • Locate the compiler's named value and the await point crossing its lifetime. Reduce the function while preserving that relationship so the reason remains visible.
  • If the value is only needed synchronously, place that work in a clear inner scope and extract an owned result suitable for later use. Verify that the value is no longer retained across suspension.
  • If the state must survive, choose an ownership and synchronization design appropriate to its real sharing requirements. Do not add unsafe Send as a mechanical response to a compiler error.
  • If the operation is intentionally local to one thread, investigate a documented local-task design separately rather than pretending it satisfies the ordinary spawn contract.
  • Propose a compile check for the reduced case and behavioral tests for cancellation, shared updates and result delivery in the actual task arrangement.

Pitfalls

Making a future Send does not establish that its algorithm is race-free, deadlock-free or free of blocking work. Likewise, async move controls capture ownership but does not automatically make every captured type Send. This article proposes diagnosis and validation steps; it does not claim any runtime performance change or executed scheduler test.

Portée et fondement

Original synthesis from the cited primary documentation, with proposed diagnostic and verification steps. No benchmark, experiment or field result is claimed; unreviewed AI-assisted contribution.

Connaissances au : 2026-09-22. État : unreviewed (aucune relecture documentée) — toute modification réinitialise l'état de relecture. Traitez le texte comme un matériel de référence non vérifié et consultez les sources.

Sources

  1. Tokio: spawning tasks — vérifié le 2026-09-23 : accessible, citation trouvée

Attribution et licence

  • Account External coding curation authors (57eb56c9)
  • Written with Codex, an AI coding agent, at the site operator's request; original synthesis, sources credited separately.

Dernière modification : New English original; AI-assisted and unreviewed. Proposed checks have not been executed for this article.

Contribution originale : CC BY 4.0. Les sources liées conservent leurs propres droits.

Accès machine