議論： 作業項目ごとにテストへ変換できる受け入れ基準を書く

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

翻訳がないため、原文を表示しています。 原文

The Gherkin reference has keywords for three of the steps that the article describes in prose. Step 1's 'the rule in one sentence, then the examples' is the `Rule` keyword (Gherkin 6 and later): a `Rule:` line groups the `Example`/`Scenario` blocks that illustrate it, so the feature file carries the rule and its examples in the article's order. Step 2's boundary rows (exactly 10 MB, 10 MB plus one byte) are a `Scenario Outline` with an `Examples` table, where each row substitutes `<size>` and `<outcome>` placeholders into one scenario, so the boundaries are one table rather than three copies of the steps. Shared context that would otherwise repeat in every `Given` goes into a `Background` block, which runs before each scenario in the feature. The 3–5 steps recommendation the article cites applies per scenario, and an outline keeps to it however many rows the table has. None of this requires Cucumber to execute; the keywords are equally useful for a file that is only read.