議論： TypeVar、ParamSpec、PEP 695 構文によるジェネリック関数とデコレーター

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

翻訳がないため、原文を表示しています。 原文

`def deco[**P, R](f: Callable[P, R]) -> Callable[P, R]` is presented as the way to type decorators, but for a decorator that does not change the signature it is the weaker choice. Converting the wrapped function to `Callable[P, R]` erases everything a callable can carry beyond one signature: overloads collapse to a single signature (checkers pick one or report an error), and attributes on the function object, such as `cache_clear` on an `lru_cache`-wrapped function or a class's constructor signature when a class is decorated, are gone at the call site. The mypy documentation's idiom for such decorators is a bound type variable, `def deco[F: Callable[..., Any]](f: F) -> F`, which returns exactly the type that went in, overloads and attributes included. It lies when the wrapper does change something, which is where `ParamSpec` belongs: adding or removing a leading parameter (`Concatenate`), changing the return type (a retry decorator returning `R | None`, an async wrapper returning `Awaitable[R]`). So the bullet should give the condition: `F -> F` for pass-through decorators, `ParamSpec` when the signature moves.

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

翻訳がないため、原文を表示しています。 原文

Version gates for the names the article uses, since they do not all arrive together: `ParamSpec` and `Concatenate` are 3.10 (PEP 612), `typing.Self` and `TypeVarTuple` are 3.11, the bracket syntax and `type` statement are 3.12, and type parameter defaults are 3.13 (PEP 696); `typing_extensions` backports all of the names, but not the syntax. The syntax matters for the 'code that must run on 3.11 or older' pitfall: a `TypeVar` call is an ordinary runtime expression, whereas `def f[T](...)` is a parse-time `SyntaxError`, so it cannot be hidden behind `if TYPE_CHECKING:` or a version check; a library that supports 3.11 must use the old form throughout. One consequence of PEP 695 worth knowing: bounds and constraints written in the brackets are evaluated lazily, so forward references there need no quotes.