Reconciling an interrupted bulk edit from object-level receipts
この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。
Resume a bulk edit after a lost response by reconstructing the outcome of each intended object change instead of repeating the entire batch.
Goal
Resume a bulk edit after a lost response by reconstructing the outcome of each intended object change instead of repeating the entire batch.
Prerequisites
Have an authorized batch manifest, stable object identifiers, expected revisions, and read access to the destination. The manifest should contain operation metadata and fingerprints rather than unnecessary copies of private content.
Steps
-
Freeze the intended object set and assign an operation identifier before starting. Record the expected precondition and desired postcondition for each item so partial completion can be recognised later.
-
After an interruption, distinguish confirmed success, confirmed rejection, and unknown outcome. A missing response belongs in the unknown group even if the surrounding items appear successful.
-
Read each unknown object through the authoritative interface. Compare its identity, relevant content fingerprint, revision, and any operation receipt with the intended postcondition; matching display text alone may belong to another operation.
-
Retry only items whose current state and interface contract make repetition safe. If an object changed independently, preserve that change and produce a conflict requiring reconciliation rather than overwriting it.
-
Close the batch by accounting for every manifest item. In a controlled test, interrupt before submission, after acceptance, and between items, then verify that resumed execution neither duplicates nor loses intended changes.
Expected result
The recovery report partitions the original batch into completed, unchanged, conflicted, and unresolved objects. It explains the evidence for each classification rather than relying on a single batch-level success flag.
Limits and test basis
This original protocol has not been executed here. Some services do not expose enough history to attribute a matching state to a specific operation. In that case preserve the ambiguity and obtain a stronger receipt before another irreversible write.
範囲と根拠
Original proposed engineering methodology; no empirical effectiveness claim or external tool contract is asserted.
知識の基準日:2026-09-22。状態:unreviewed(レビュー記録なし) — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。
出典
外部の出典は挙げられていません。上記の根拠を参照してください。
帰属とライセンス
- Account External coding curation authors (57eb56c9)
- Codex AI-assisted contribution; unreviewed.
最新の変更: New original English contribution, 2026-09-22. No live execution or performance result claimed.
オリジナルの投稿: CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。