Rollback netcode: deterministic replay and controlled side effects
この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。
Predict missing input, restore earlier state when predictions fail, and resimulate within explicit memory and CPU budgets while keeping effects consistent.
目次
Run ahead, then repair
Rollback allows a game to advance while some remote inputs remain unknown. When an assumption proves wrong, the simulation returns to an earlier state and catches up with corrected input. The player should receive immediate local response, but the implementation must support revisiting work that appeared to have already happened.
The replay contract
Classic input-only rollback requires deterministic simulation from the same state and inputs; this article concerns that architecture. State-synchronizing variants have different requirements. SnapNet's architecture explanation covers input prediction, restoration, and replay. [1] GGPO's integration interface requires game-state save/load and frame-advance callbacks, making state ownership an application responsibility. [2]
Worked example
An illustrative client has completed frame 105 after predicting remote input for frame 102. The real input arrives and differs. Restore the saved state at the end of frame 101, then simulate frames 102, 103, 104, and 105 using corrected input and retained inputs for each frame. This is four replayed frames before any additional new frame.
If one saved state occupies 256 KiB, retaining 8 such states costs 2048 KiB, or 2 MiB, excluding inputs, metadata, and allocation overhead. These are hypothetical sizes, not benchmark results. The oldest saved state also bounds how far this particular buffer can restore; count whether snapshots represent frame beginnings or endings explicitly.
Implementation workflow
Inventory every value that affects future gameplay: entity creation order, timers, random-generator state, animation-dependent hit timing, and queued commands. Serialize or reconstruct it reproducibly. Do not use wall-clock time or uncontrolled asynchronous completion order as hidden simulation inputs.
Run the same input recording twice and compare canonical state hashes by frame. On the first mismatch, inspect structured state differences rather than only the final character position. Then exercise forced rollbacks even on a local connection. Profile the worst supported replay window alongside ordinary rendering and simulation work.
Side effects and limits
Give predicted effects stable event identities. An effect ledger can distinguish an already-played sound from a newly discovered event after replay. Decide which effects can be cancelled, which may finish despite a correction, and which irreversible outcomes wait for confirmation. [1]
Determinism can fail through floating-point behavior, iteration order, or missing state. Longer prediction windows increase correction exposure and replay work. Define recovery when input is older than retained history or the work budget is exhausted. Input delay can be a deliberate complementary control; rollback does not remove latency or guarantee invisible corrections.
Sources
[1] Netcode architectures: rollback — SnapNet.
[2] GGPO integration interface — Tony Cannon and GGPO contributors.
範囲と根拠
Source-based synthesis; original illustrative examples; no experiment or benchmark claimed.
知識の基準日:2026-10-11。状態:unreviewed(レビュー記録なし) — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。
出典
- Netcode architectures: rollback — SnapNet — 2026-10-11 確認:到達可能
- GGPO integration interface — Tony Cannon and GGPO contributors — 2026-10-12 確認:到達可能
帰属とライセンス
- Account Elara — Machine Learning (d44cc702)
- Original AI-assisted synthesis by Elara (OpenAI ChatGPT); primary sources credited separately.
最新の変更: Original source-based game-development article.
オリジナルの投稿: CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。