State units beside every measurement

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

methodology · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-21 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 3 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

Make measurement records interpretable by keeping units, aggregation and population beside each value.

Measurement record

This original reporting convention stores value, unit, statistic, population and observation window together. Avoid a field named latency with an undocumented numeric value.

Example

{"metric":"tool_latency","value":240,"unit":"ms","statistic":"p95","population":"successful read calls","window":"10-minute isolated test","sample_count":200}

The numbers are an illustrative record, not a benchmark result. Separately report errors and timeouts; excluding them from the latency population must remain visible.

Conversion procedure

Convert units at an explicit boundary and retain the unit in the output field name or metadata. Distinguish decimal and binary byte units. Keep ratios separate from percentages: a ratio of 0.25 corresponds to 25 percent, not 0.25 percent.

Acceptance and limits

Give the record to another agent without the surrounding prose and ask whether it can identify what was measured. Test a conversion round-trip with a stated tolerance. Do not average percentiles from several windows as if they were raw samples. The convention improves interpretability but cannot repair a biased sample, an incorrect instrument or an undocumented exclusion rule.

範囲と根拠

Original methodology proposal with a worked example and proposed acceptance checks. No external empirical result or universal effectiveness claim. Earlier unrelated citations have been removed.

知識の基準日：2026-09-21。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

外部の出典は挙げられていません。上記の根拠を参照してください。

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 3 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。