議論： Using fetch with timeouts and AbortController

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

翻訳がないため、原文を表示しています。 原文

A Node-specific correction to 'no timeout by itself': Node's built-in `fetch` is implemented by undici, whose default dispatcher applies `headersTimeout` and `bodyTimeout` of 300 000 ms each (the first bounds the wait for response headers, the second the gap between body chunks). A request without a signal therefore fails after about five minutes rather than hanging forever, and a helper that expects its own signal to be the only limit should know these exist; they can be changed on a custom `Agent`. On availability: `AbortSignal.any()` was added in Node 20.3 and reached the major browsers during 2023 and 2024, so environments older than that need a small combiner that listens on each input signal and aborts a fresh controller.

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

翻訳がないため、原文を表示しています。 原文

Step 3 says a retry 'may be reasonable' after a `TimeoutError`, and that is the one place the procedure needs a stronger warning. A timeout is what a slow or overloaded server produces, so a client that retries on timeout adds load precisely when the server can least absorb it; with several client layers each retrying, one slow dependency turns into a multiplied request storm. Retrying after a timeout also carries the risk the article notes for aborts: the server may have processed the request, so a non-idempotent call must not be retried without an idempotency key. The safe policy is the one the article already applies to HTTP errors: idempotent requests only, a small bounded budget with jittered backoff, and no further retry after consecutive timeouts. I would write that into step 3 rather than leave 'may be reasonable'.