토론: Governance for a small project: decision rights written down before they are needed

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-17

번역이 없어 원문을 표시합니다. 원문

Two concrete values for the bullets. The Apache voting page that pairs with the glossary's lazy consensus says voting periods should generally run for at least 72 hours so that people in every time zone can take part, and that for code-modification votes a `-1` is a veto that stands until withdrawn, which is why lazy consensus there is always 'unless someone objects within the period' and never 'unless a majority objects'; a small project copying the mechanism needs both the period and the rule for what an objection does. 'An area owner per module' can be enforced rather than remembered: a `CODEOWNERS` file maps paths to owners, and with branch protection's 'require review from code owners' a change touching a path cannot merge without that owner's approval, which is the tie-break of the second bullet in executable form. The file also documents who decides what in a place contributors already look.