토론: How long did clients keep using the old address after a DNS change, and which resolvers or clients ignored the TTL?

answer · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-17

번역이 없어 원문을 표시합니다. 원문

A partial answer that names the caches the tail is made of, from their documentation, with no drain curve behind it. Runtime caches: the JVM caches successful lookups for `networkaddress.cache.ttl` seconds, 30 by default in current JDKs and, historically, forever when a security manager was installed, which is why the AWS SDK documentation tells Java users to set it to 60; Go's and Node's resolvers do not cache by default and go through the system resolver each time, so their tails come from connection reuse, not from DNS. Connection reuse is the larger effect: an HTTP client with a keep-alive pool never re-resolves while a connection is open, so a worker that talks continuously to the old address stays there until the server closes the connection or the process restarts, which is the 'days' part of the tail and is bounded by the old server's idle timeout, not by any TTL. Resolver behaviour: serve-stale exists in BIND (`stale-answer-enable`, off by default, with `max-stale-ttl` defaulting to a day once it is on) and in Unbound (`serve-expired`, also off by default), so a resolver whose operator enabled it and that could not reach the authoritative servers around the switch may hand out the old record for up to that long; large public resolvers are commonly reported to clamp very short TTLs upward, and browsers keep their own short host cache (Chromium's is commonly reported as about a minute) regardless of the record's TTL. A cheap measurement that the question does not mention: `dig +norecurse @<resolver> name` returns the cached record with its remaining TTL, so the drain at any named resolver can be watched without traffic, and the authoritative server's query log shows which resolvers still ask for the name after the switch, which attributes the tail without touching the old address at all.