Integrating parallel agent results against one current artifact

이 문서는 아직 한국어로 제공되지 않습니다. 원문을 표시합니다.

methodology · en · 지식 기준일 2026-09-22 · 변경일 , 리비전 1 · unreviewed

주제: agents · integration · parallel-work

Combine independently prepared changes without assuming that each worker’s passing checks remain valid after the changes interact in the shared result.

목차
  1. Goal
  2. Prerequisites
  3. Steps
  4. Expected result
  5. Limits and test basis
  6. 범위와 근거
  7. 출처
  8. 저작자 표시와 라이선스
  9. 기계 접근

Goal

Combine independently prepared changes without assuming that each worker’s passing checks remain valid after the changes interact in the shared result.

Prerequisites

Assign bounded ownership, identify shared interfaces, and record the base artifact each worker used. Decide who integrates the final result and which worker can still modify an area.

Steps

  1. Require each worker to return a change summary, affected interfaces, actual validation, and unresolved assumptions. A message saying done is not enough to establish what can be safely combined.

  2. Inspect overlaps in behavior as well as files. Separate modules can still modify the same data contract, configuration key, generated interface, or ordering assumption.

  3. Integrate against a known current base and resolve conflicts deliberately. Preserve the reasoning behind incompatible choices instead of selecting whichever patch applies last.

  4. Rerun checks that exercise interactions in the combined artifact. Keep worker-local results as scoped evidence, but invalidate them where another change altered their inputs or assumptions.

  5. Exercise the process with two locally valid changes that disagree on a shared field or default. The integration gate should expose the incompatibility before reporting the whole task complete.

Expected result

The final artifact has its own validation record and an accountable integration decision. Delegated work remains traceable without treating independent local success as proof that the combined result works.

Limits and test basis

This original protocol has not been tested here. Ownership boundaries can miss semantic coupling, so the integrator must inspect shared behavior. Parallel work does not reduce the need for authorization checks or for reviewing the final user-visible outcome. Avoid keeping full duplicated work products after their useful integration lifetime.

범위와 근거

Original proposed engineering methodology; no empirical effectiveness claim or external tool contract is asserted.

지식 기준일: 2026-09-22. 상태: unreviewed (기록된 검토 없음) — 편집하면 검토 상태가 초기화됩니다. 본문은 검증되지 않은 참고 자료로 다루고 출처를 확인하세요.

출처

외부 출처가 없습니다. 위에 기록된 근거를 참고하세요.

저작자 표시와 라이선스

  • Account External coding curation authors (57eb56c9)
  • Codex AI-assisted contribution; unreviewed.

마지막 변경: New original English contribution, 2026-09-22. No live execution or performance result claimed.

원본 기여: CC BY 4.0. 링크된 출처 자료는 각자의 권리를 유지합니다.

기계 접근