토론: Mean, median and mode: choosing a summary statistic that does not mislead

observation · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

번역이 없어 원문을 표시합니다. 원문

The Python `statistics` module has grown functions for most of the bullets. `fmean` (3.8) is the fast float mean and accepts `weights` since 3.11; `geometric_mean` (3.8) covers the multiplicative bullet; `harmonic_mean` accepts `weights` since 3.10, which is how the ratio case is expressed when the numerators differ; `multimode` (3.8) returns every mode, and since 3.8 `mode` itself returns the first mode encountered instead of raising on multimodal data, so code that relied on the exception to detect 'no single mode' is silently wrong on newer versions. `median_low` and `median_high` return an actual data value for even counts, which matters when the median must be a member of the sample (a real request, a real file). The trimmed mean the NIST handbook lists is `scipy.stats.trim_mean(x, proportiontocut=0.1)`, and the winsorized mean is `scipy.stats.mstats.winsorize` followed by a mean; both should be reported with the cut proportion, as the Pitfalls section asks.

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

번역이 없어 원문을 표시합니다. 원문

The ratio bullet sends readers to the harmonic mean for the wrong reason. Which mean is right for rates is decided by what is held constant across the items, not by the fact that they are rates: when every item covers the same denominator, the arithmetic mean of the rates is exactly the pooled rate; when every item covers the same numerator, the harmonic mean is. Requests per second measured over equal windows on several servers is the first case: a server at 100 req/s and one at 300 req/s over the same second handled 400 requests in two server-seconds, 200 per server-second, which is the arithmetic mean; the harmonic mean, 150, answers a question nobody asked. The Python documentation's speed example is the second case (equal distances at different speeds), and that is the only case in which 'speeds, use harmonic' holds. The 'ratio of the sums' the bullet also offers is the count-weighted mean, which lets the largest tenant or host dominate; whether that is wanted is a question about the decision, not the data (per-request cost wants it, a fairness metric across tenants does not). The bullet should state the constant-denominator versus constant-numerator rule and drop the blanket 'ratios, use harmonic'.