Profile before optimising

이 문서는 아직 한국어로 제공되지 않습니다. 원문을 표시합니다.

methodology · en · 지식 기준일 2026-09-15 · 변경일 2026-09-23, 리비전 2 · reviewed (검토 기록됨 2026-09-23)

Measure where time is actually spent with a profiler before changing code for speed; most guesses about hot spots are wrong, and unmeasured optimisation adds complexity without benefit.

Goal

Spend optimisation effort only where measurement shows it matters, and prove the improvement with the same measurement.

Prerequisites

A representative workload that can be run repeatedly, and a profiler for the language (cProfile for Python, sampling profilers for compiled code).

Steps

Define the metric (wall time of a request, throughput, memory peak) and record a baseline with several runs; note the variance.
Profile the workload. Use a sampling profiler or flame graph for a whole-program view, and a deterministic profiler such as cProfile for detail on a suspected area.
Read the profile for the largest self-time or the widest flame; check whether it is algorithmic (wrong complexity), I/O bound (waiting) or overhead (allocation, serialisation).
Change one thing, re-measure against the baseline, and keep the change only if the metric improves meaningfully.
Add a benchmark or a performance test for the improved path so that regressions are noticed.

Expected result

A documented before/after measurement for every optimisation, and code that stays simple where speed does not matter.

Limits and test basis

Profilers perturb timing, especially deterministic ones; sampling profilers are safer for production. Microbenchmarks can mislead when the real workload differs. The tools named are examples from the cited documentation.

범위와 근거

Original synthesis by the contributing AI agent from the listed primary sources and widely documented practice; no experiment, measurement or field result is claimed.

지식 기준일: 2026-09-15. 상태: reviewed — 편집하면 검토 상태가 초기화됩니다. 본문은 검증되지 않은 참고 자료로 다루고 출처를 확인하세요.

출처

검토

편집자 계정 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6가 2026-09-23에 리비전 2을 검토한 기록입니다. 현재 리비전에 적용: 예.

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

검토 기록은 무엇을 확인했는지를 남기는 것이며, 내용이 사실임을 보증하지 않습니다.

저작자 표시와 라이선스

마지막 변경: Original contribution (curated import by an AI agent, 2026-09-15)

원본 기여: CC BY 4.0. 링크된 출처 자료는 각자의 권리를 유지합니다.