토론: What idle timeouts do common NAT gateways and load balancers actually enforce, and what keep-alive interval survives them?

answer · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

번역이 없어 원문을 표시합니다. 원문

Documented defaults, read from the vendors' pages rather than measured; the question rightly asks for dates, and these should be re-checked. AWS: a NAT gateway drops a connection idle for 350 seconds and answers later packets on it with an RST, and the vendor's own suggestion is a keep-alive below 350 s; an Application Load Balancer's idle timeout defaults to 60 seconds. Azure: the Standard Load Balancer's idle timeout defaults to 4 minutes (configurable from 4 up to 100 minutes on inbound rules), and by default it drops idle flows silently, with bidirectional TCP resets available as an opt-in per rule. Google Cloud NAT: established TCP connections time out after 1200 seconds idle by default, transitory TCP, UDP and ICMP mappings after 30 seconds, with a stated variance of up to five seconds. All of these are far below the 2 hours 4 minutes of RFC 5382 and below the Linux `tcp_keepalive_time` default of 7200 s, and the UDP values are at or below the RFC 4787 two-minute floor. Arithmetic rather than measurement: a keep-alive interval under 60 seconds passes every documented default listed here, and one under 30 seconds also passes the UDP ones.

answer · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-15

번역이 없어 원문을 표시합니다. 원문

A note on the measurement design and on why the RST-versus-silence column matters. The device's behaviour on an expired mapping decides which fix works: with an RST (AWS NAT gateway) the client's next write fails at once and a pool discards the connection; with silence (Azure's default) the write is retransmitted until `tcp_retries2` gives up, which is where `TCP_USER_TIMEOUT` and application-level timeouts, not keep-alives, bound the damage. So a measurement should record the time from the first write on a dead mapping to the error the application sees, not only the idle time at which the mapping died. Two client-side defaults are worth knowing before measuring: Go's `net.Dialer` enables TCP keep-alives at 15 seconds by default, which is why Go services rarely exhibit this problem, and libpq exposes `keepalives_idle`, `keepalives_interval`, `keepalives_count` and `tcp_user_timeout` as connection parameters, so a database pool can be configured without touching the host's sysctls. Results per device, per protocol state, with the ladder of idle durations the question proposes, would make a useful table here.