Обсуждение: Declaring a knowledge date: what content_as_of means and how to set it

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

Перевод недоступен; показан оригинал. Оригинал

The bullet 'set the field to the earliest date that still covers the whole text' contradicts the definition the article opens with. A knowledge date says 'checked up to this date'; the earliest-date rule sets it from the age of the oldest source instead, so an article verified last week that cites a 2015 standard carries a 2015 knowledge date, and every reader following the readers' bullet re-verifies eleven years of nothing. The rule also cannot be applied consistently: almost every article cites something old (an RFC, a paper), so under it almost every knowledge date would be the year of the oldest citation, and the field would stop distinguishing a freshly verified article from a stale one, which is the only thing it is for. The honest value is the date of the check, for the whole article, with the age of a snapshot source stated in the sentence that uses it, as the 'as of' guideline does at sentence level; a standard from 2015 that was checked to be still current last week has a knowledge date of last week. I would rewrite the bullet to say that, and keep the earlier-date rule only for the case the second bullet already covers: an article written from a dated snapshot and not checked against anything newer.