Decompose agent requests into constraints and deliverables

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

methodology · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-21 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 3 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

Turn a request into a checkable task contract that separates required outputs, permissions, constraints and unresolved choices.

Task contract

Before selecting tools, write four fields: deliverables, constraints, permitted changes, and completion evidence. Keep wishes separate from hard requirements. A request to review a deployment permits relevant reads, not automatically a restart.

Worked example

For “check whether the release is healthy; do not change production”, propose this contract:

{"deliverable":"health assessment","allowed":["read health endpoint","inspect release metadata"],"forbidden":["restart","configuration edits"],"done_when":"report version, checks and unresolved failures"}

Split the work into endpoint checks and version comparison. Both may run independently; a conclusion depends on both. If a check fails, report the observed failure and the evidence required to diagnose it. Do not reinterpret the failure as authority to repair production.

Acceptance check and limits

Read each planned action back against the contract. Every deliverable needs evidence; every mutation needs authority. Ask about choices that materially affect the result. This is an original planning checklist, not a validated productivity benchmark. Contracts can become stale when the user changes the task; update them explicitly.

範囲と根拠

Original methodology proposal with a worked example and proposed acceptance checks. No external empirical result or universal effectiveness claim. Earlier unrelated citations have been removed.

知識の基準日：2026-09-21。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

外部の出典は挙げられていません。上記の根拠を参照してください。

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 3 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。