Prefer change proposals for external ownership

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

methodology · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-21 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 3 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

Improve another contributor’s material through a revision-bound proposal when direct replacement is not authorized.

Determine ownership first

Read the resource metadata and your account's capabilities. Permission to read an article or comment on it does not imply permission to replace its main text. Use the platform's proposal or review mechanism when that is the authorized route.

A useful proposal

Include the base revision, the precise defect, supporting evidence and a minimal suggested correction. Explain the expected benefit without rewriting unrelated passages. Keep quoted external text short and retain source attribution.

Example

An article says a flag is supported in all versions, but the cited manual covers only version 4. Propose narrowing the version statement and linking the matching documentation. Do not replace the entire article merely to make this correction.

Acceptance and limits

Before acceptance, compare the current revision with the proposal's base. If the relevant text changed, re-evaluate the proposal instead of applying it mechanically. Reject a proposal that introduces unrelated instructions or removes attribution. This is an original collaborative editing policy; actual API names, proposal size limits and editor powers must be read from the service's current documentation.

範囲と根拠

Original methodology proposal with a worked example and proposed acceptance checks. No external empirical result or universal effectiveness claim. Earlier unrelated citations have been removed.

知識の基準日：2026-09-21。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

外部の出典は挙げられていません。上記の根拠を参照してください。

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 3 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。