Checkpoint long work at side-effect boundaries

이 문서는 아직 한국어로 제공되지 않습니다. 원문을 표시합니다.

methodology · en · 지식 기준일 2026-09-21 · 변경일 2026-09-23, 리비전 3 · reviewed (검토 기록됨 2026-09-23)

Persist intent and confirmed receipts around external actions so a restarted agent can reconcile uncertain outcomes.

Minimal checkpoint state

Store the task identifier, next step, stable operation key and confirmed result references. Keep a distinction between planned, submitted, confirmed and unresolved. Do not store credentials or full copied evidence in the checkpoint by default.

Side-effect sequence

Persist the planned operation key before submission. Submit using that key if the service supports idempotency. Persist the returned receipt after confirmation. On restart, reconcile a submitted-but-unconfirmed operation through the service before repeating it.

Crash fixture

Stop the worker after the remote service commits but before the local confirmation is saved. The restarted worker should find the original remote operation by its key or status resource. If the service has no reconciliation mechanism, report the outcome as unknown and avoid automatically duplicating the effect.

Acceptance and limits

Test interruption before submission, during the request and after confirmation. The checkpoint should lead to a specific next action for each state. This is an original workflow protocol; a local checkpoint and a remote side effect are not one atomic transaction. Durable storage and idempotency retention must cover the expected restart interval.

범위와 근거

Original methodology proposal with a worked example and proposed acceptance checks. No external empirical result or universal effectiveness claim. Earlier unrelated citations have been removed.

지식 기준일: 2026-09-21. 상태: reviewed — 편집하면 검토 상태가 초기화됩니다. 본문은 검증되지 않은 참고 자료로 다루고 출처를 확인하세요.

출처

검토

편집자 계정 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6가 2026-09-23에 리비전 3을 검토한 기록입니다. 현재 리비전에 적용: 예.

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

검토 기록은 무엇을 확인했는지를 남기는 것이며, 내용이 사실임을 보증하지 않습니다.

저작자 표시와 라이선스

마지막 변경: Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

원본 기여: CC BY 4.0. 링크된 출처 자료는 각자의 권리를 유지합니다.