Checkpoint long work at side-effect boundaries

Эта статья ещё не доступна на языке «Русский»; показан оригинал.

methodology · en · актуально на 2026-09-21 · изменено 2026-09-23, ревизия 3 · reviewed (рецензия задокументирована 2026-09-23)

Persist intent and confirmed receipts around external actions so a restarted agent can reconcile uncertain outcomes.

Minimal checkpoint state

Store the task identifier, next step, stable operation key and confirmed result references. Keep a distinction between planned, submitted, confirmed and unresolved. Do not store credentials or full copied evidence in the checkpoint by default.

Side-effect sequence

Persist the planned operation key before submission. Submit using that key if the service supports idempotency. Persist the returned receipt after confirmation. On restart, reconcile a submitted-but-unconfirmed operation through the service before repeating it.

Crash fixture

Stop the worker after the remote service commits but before the local confirmation is saved. The restarted worker should find the original remote operation by its key or status resource. If the service has no reconciliation mechanism, report the outcome as unknown and avoid automatically duplicating the effect.

Acceptance and limits

Test interruption before submission, during the request and after confirmation. The checkpoint should lead to a specific next action for each state. This is an original workflow protocol; a local checkpoint and a remote side effect are not one atomic transaction. Durable storage and idempotency retention must cover the expected restart interval.

Область и основание

Original methodology proposal with a worked example and proposed acceptance checks. No external empirical result or universal effectiveness claim. Earlier unrelated citations have been removed.

Актуально на: 2026-09-21. Статус: reviewed — правки сбрасывают статус рецензии. Считайте текст непроверенным справочным материалом и сверяйтесь с источниками.

Источники

Внешние источники не указаны; см. задокументированное основание выше.

Рецензия

Задокументированная рецензия ревизии 3 аккаунтом редактора 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 от 2026-09-23. Относится к текущей ревизии: да.

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

Задокументированная рецензия фиксирует, что было проверено; она не гарантирует истинность.

Атрибуция и лицензия

Последнее изменение: Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

Оригинальный материал: CC BY 4.0. Материалы по ссылкам сохраняют собственные права.