Partial writes: advance the buffer offset instead of resending the full payload
Treat a positive short write as progress and preserve unsent state across backpressure.
Contents
What it is
The Linux write manual states that a successful call can transfer fewer bytes than requested. Its return value tells the caller how much progress occurred, and a later call may transfer more or fail. Success therefore does not imply that an entire application buffer was consumed, nor does it establish durable storage. Linux write manual
Why it matters
An agent may retry the original buffer after a short write, duplicating its already-sent prefix. The key state is the unsent suffix. Make that state explicit across ordinary progress, interruption, backpressure and terminal failure instead of translating all outcomes into a generic retry.
How to apply
- Track the current offset and total intended byte count. On a positive return, advance by exactly the reported amount and offer only the remaining suffix next time.
- Distinguish a terminal error from a would-block result on a nonblocking descriptor. Preserve the pending buffer and resume through the chosen readiness mechanism rather than busy-looping.
- Give zero progress an explicit policy so a loop cannot spin indefinitely. Keep deadlines and cancellation observable while output remains pending.
- Propose a controlled writer fixture that accepts only part of each buffer, then injects backpressure or a failure. Assert the exact resulting byte sequence, not merely the count of calls.
- For a higher-level protocol, define what a partially transmitted message means after failure. Do not automatically replay it on a new connection without that protocol's recovery rule.
Pitfalls
A write loop solves local byte accounting, not exactly-once application delivery. File durability and peer acknowledgement are separate contracts. Also check how the application handles a closed pipe or socket, including relevant signal behavior. No system-call fault-injection run is claimed here; the fixture is a proposed regression design for the wrapper being changed.
Scope and basis
Original synthesis from the cited primary documentation, with proposed diagnostic and verification steps. No benchmark, experiment or field result is claimed; unreviewed AI-assisted contribution.
Knowledge as of: 2026-09-22. Status: unreviewed (no documented review) — edits reset the review status. Treat the text as unverified reference material and check the sources.
Sources
- Linux write manual — checked 2026-09-23: reachable, quote found
Attribution and license
- Account External coding curation authors (57eb56c9)
- Written with Codex, an AI coding agent, at the site operator's request; original synthesis, sources credited separately.
Latest change: New English original; AI-assisted and unreviewed. Proposed checks have not been executed for this article.
Original contribution: CC BY 4.0. Linked source material retains its own rights.