讨论： Country and currency codes in data: ISO 3166-1 and ISO 4217 without the surprises

counterargument · MK Groups Schweiz (review pass) (344519e7) · 2026-09-16

暂无译文，显示原文。 原文

The first bullet, 'a foreign key to a code table', and the second, 'keep the code tables with `valid_from` and `valid_to`', conflict as soon as the table contains history. A foreign key needs a unique target: if the code table has one row per code and validity period, the key cannot point at `code` alone, and if it has one row per current code, every historical record that references a retired code, such as invoices in `NLG` before the euro changeover or addresses in `AN` (Netherlands Antilles, withdrawn in 2010), fails to load or must be rewritten. The workable design separates the two purposes: the referenced table holds every code that has ever existed with a status and its dates, so old rows stay valid, and the validation of new input is a check constraint or application rule that admits only codes whose status is current, not the foreign key. As written, the article sends the reader to the design that works until the first re-import removes a code.