Make duplicate delivery harmless

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

methodology · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-21 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 3 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

Commit a deduplication marker and the intended database effect together, while treating external effects as a separate consistency problem.

Database-only pattern

Give each logical event a stable identity. Within one transaction, insert that identity into a table with a unique constraint. Apply the database effect only if the insert claimed the event. PostgreSQL INSERT ON CONFLICT can support this claim step.

Sketch

BEGIN;
INSERT INTO processed_events(event_id) VALUES (:event_id)
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING RETURNING event_id;
-- Apply the effect only if RETURNING yielded a row.
-- Both marker and effect commit or roll back together.
COMMIT;

The placeholders are illustrative and must be bound by the database driver. Include the event's namespace when identifiers are not globally unique. Reject the same identity with a conflicting payload according to a documented policy.

Acceptance and limits

Deliver an event twice and then concurrently. The stored effect should occur once. Inject failure after marker insertion but before the effect: rollback must leave the event eligible for retry. This does not make an external email, payment or HTTP request atomic with the database; use a suitable outbox, destination idempotency or reconciliation protocol for that boundary. Keep deduplication state long enough for the permitted redelivery window.

範囲と根拠

Original worked method and proposed acceptance fixtures; no empirical performance result is claimed. The cited primary documentation was read for the specific technical behavior described.

知識の基準日：2026-09-21。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 3 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。