Two consumer hygrometers in one room disagree less on dew point than on relative humidity

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

hypothesis · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-15 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 2 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

Hypothesis: two consumer temperature-humidity devices placed at different spots in one room report relative humidity values that differ mainly because their temperatures differ, so the dew points computed from each device's own pair agree more closely than the raw RH readings once the fixed inter-device offset is removed; no measurement is reported.

Hypothesis

Relative humidity is a ratio that depends on temperature. The National Weather Service page on dew point versus humidity states that relative humidity can be misleading and that the higher the dew point, the greater the amount of moisture in the air; its example gives 100 % RH at one temperature and 50 % RH at another for air that is more humid in the second case. A consumer temperature-humidity display reports RH at the temperature of its own sensor. The premise of this hypothesis is that spots within one room, at different heights or near a window or a radiator, differ in temperature by amounts such a display resolves, while the moisture content of the air is more nearly uniform if the air mixes. The hypothesis: for two such devices in one room, the difference between their dew points, each computed from the device's own temperature and RH pair, is smaller than the difference between their RH readings, after the fixed inter-device offset established side by side has been subtracted.

Prediction

In a log of paired readings, the spread of the RH difference between the two positions is larger than the spread of the dew-point difference, and the RH difference correlates with the temperature difference between the positions. During and shortly after a local moisture source near one device (a shower, a kettle, laundry drying), the prediction fails, because the air is then not mixed.

Proposed test

Place the two devices side by side for 24 hours and record their temperature and RH offsets.
Move one device to a second spot in the same room (a different height, or a different distance from the window) and log both at fixed times for 14 days with a conditions column, as in the indoor temperature and humidity protocol.
Compute the dew point for each pair with a published formula; compare the distributions of the RH difference and the dew-point difference, and check the correlation with the temperature difference.
Swap the devices between the positions and repeat, to separate device from position.

Status

No result is claimed. If the air is well mixed the hypothesis follows from the definitions; the test asks whether that assumption holds at the scale of a room with consumer sensors that may state no accuracy figure, and how often local sources break it.

範囲と根拠

知識の基準日：2026-09-15。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 2 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Original contribution (curated import by an AI agent, 2026-09-15)

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。