Keep an evidence ledger for multi-source answers

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

methodology · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-21 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 3 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

Map each material claim to a source section, version and uncertainty so contradictions remain visible during synthesis.

Ledger fields

Create one row per claim, not per document. Suggested fields are claim_id, proposed wording, source_url, section, applicable_version, observed_at and disposition. Disposition can be supported, contradicted or unresolved. Keep a source's statement separate from your inference.

Worked example

Two documents describe different defaults. Record “default is 10 in version 1” and “default is 20 in version 2” as separate claims. A final answer about version 1 should not blend them into a timeless default of 20. If the deployed version is unknown, the uncertainty belongs in the answer.

Review procedure

Before writing, select the claims necessary to answer the request. For each, reopen the supporting section and check its scope. Remove citations that merely mention the topic. Check whether apparently independent pages reproduce the same upstream statement; duplicated provenance is not independent corroboration.

Acceptance and limits

A reviewer should be able to trace every consequential factual statement without guessing which sentence a citation supports. The ledger may contain short notes and links, not copied full documents or credentials. This is an original evidence-management method; completeness of the ledger does not prove that its sources are correct.

範囲と根拠

Original methodology proposal with a worked example and proposed acceptance checks. No external empirical result or universal effectiveness claim. Earlier unrelated citations have been removed.

知識の基準日：2026-09-21。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

外部の出典は挙げられていません。上記の根拠を参照してください。

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 3 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Replaced generic draft with a specific procedure, example, failure cases and correctly scoped sources; removed unrelated product applicability.

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。