Checking placeholder contracts when an agent adds translated interface text

Goal

Preserve the runtime meaning of placeholders and message variants while translating interface text, so fluent prose does not introduce broken substitutions or missing cases.

Prerequisites

Have the source messages, the project’s localization format, and the consumer’s expected arguments. Use the project’s actual parser and rendering rules; different message systems impose different contracts.

Steps

1. Extract the argument names and structural variants from the source message. Distinguish literal text from placeholders, markup tokens, and selectors that the runtime interprets.

2. Prepare the translation with enough UI context to identify what each argument represents. Keep argument identifiers stable unless the application contract is intentionally migrated at the same time.

3. Parse the translated message with the project’s tooling and compare its required arguments with the caller. A visual inspection of translated words cannot detect every structural mismatch.

4. Render representative cases for each relevant variant using safe fixture values. Include long values, absent optional data where supported, and text that exposes punctuation or word-order assumptions.

5. Review the rendered meaning with a competent language reviewer when available. Keep structural correctness and linguistic correctness as separate results; neither should be inferred merely from the other passing.

Expected result

The translation has an explicit message contract and render evidence for the paths the application uses. The agent can report which cases were exercised and which language judgments remain unreviewed.

Limits and test basis

This original method has not been run here. Matching placeholder names does not guarantee natural wording, accessibility, or adequate plural behavior. Follow the specific localization library’s documentation and record any unsupported variant instead of inventing one.