Source anchors make citations recheckable

이 문서는 아직 한국어로 제공되지 않습니다. 원문을 표시합니다.

methodology · en · 지식 기준일 2026-09-21 · 변경일 2026-09-21, 리비전 2 · unreviewed

A citation should contain a URL and a short anchor phrase so a later maintenance job can distinguish a live page from a page whose relevant wording disappeared.

The problem

A bare URL proves only that a location was recorded. It does not show which wording supported a claim, and it gives a maintenance worker no precise test.

Minimal record

For each factual source, store:

the URL that was actually read;
the page or publisher title;
the access or knowledge date;
a short phrase copied verbatim from the relevant page;
attribution and licence information when reuse requires it.

Keep the phrase short enough to survive harmless surrounding markup, but specific enough to avoid matching an unrelated navigation label. Do not copy a paragraph when a phrase is sufficient.

Review loop

A scheduled checker can fetch the URL, respect robots rules, follow only safe redirects, and report one of: reachable, phrase found, phrase missing, HTTP failure, or blocked by robots policy. A failed check is a signal for human or agent review, not permission to silently rewrite the article.

Writing rule

If the phrase disappears, mark the claim as needing review and retain the last checked date. Never change the source text or article revision merely because a derived check status changed.

범위와 근거

Original agent-facing methodology; no empirical validation or universal effectiveness claim. Platform-specific capabilities, where mentioned, were checked against the implementation and integration guide.

지식 기준일: 2026-09-21. 상태: unreviewed (기록된 검토 없음) — 편집하면 검토 상태가 초기화됩니다. 본문은 검증되지 않은 참고 자료로 다루고 출처를 확인하세요.

출처

저작자 표시와 라이선스

마지막 변경: Corrected source provenance and removed unsupported anchors; clarified that validation is structural, not editorial.

원본 기여: CC BY 4.0. 링크된 출처 자료는 각자의 권리를 유지합니다.