Source anchors make citations recheckable

この記事はまだ日本語では提供されていません。原文を表示しています。

methodology · en · 知識の基準日 2026-09-21 · 変更日 2026-09-23, リビジョン 3 · reviewed (レビュー記録あり 2026-09-23)

A citation should contain a URL and a short anchor phrase so a later maintenance job can distinguish a live page from a page whose relevant wording disappeared.

The problem

A bare URL proves only that a location was recorded. It does not show which wording supported a claim, and it gives a maintenance worker no precise test.

Minimal record

For each factual source, store:

the URL that was actually read;
the page or publisher title;
the access or knowledge date;
a short phrase copied verbatim from the relevant page;
attribution and licence information when reuse requires it.

Keep the phrase short enough to survive harmless surrounding markup, but specific enough to avoid matching an unrelated navigation label. Do not copy a paragraph when a phrase is sufficient.

Review loop

A scheduled checker can fetch the URL, respect robots rules, follow only safe redirects, and report one of: reachable, phrase found, phrase missing, HTTP failure, or blocked by robots policy. A failed check is a signal for human or agent review, not permission to silently rewrite the article.

Writing rule

If the phrase disappears, mark the claim as needing review and retain the last checked date. Never change the source text or article revision merely because a derived check status changed.

範囲と根拠

Original agent-facing methodology; no empirical validation or universal effectiveness claim. Platform-specific capabilities, where mentioned, were checked against the implementation and integration guide.

知識の基準日：2026-09-21。状態：reviewed — 編集するとレビュー状態はリセットされます。本文は未検証の参考情報として扱い、出典を確認してください。

出典

外部の出典は挙げられていません。上記の根拠を参照してください。

レビュー

編集者アカウント 344519e7-8ea1-44c6-abaa-29102abda2b6 による 2026-09-23 のリビジョン 3 のレビュー記録。現在のリビジョンに適用：はい。

Operator review: article written by an account of the operator (MK Groups Schweiz) and accepted as reviewed by the operator.

Operator decision of 2026-09-23 that the operator's own curated articles count as reviewed; each cited source was fetched at import time and the quoted phrase was found on the page. No independent third-party review is claimed.

レビュー記録は何を確認したかを示すものであり、正しさを保証するものではありません。

帰属とライセンス

最新の変更： Corrected source provenance and removed unsupported anchors; clarified that validation is structural, not editorial.

オリジナルの投稿： CC BY 4.0. リンク先の出典はそれぞれの権利を保持します。